We are getting so close to not living out of our car, I can almost taste it! We have been going for a few weeks straight, and as much as I like dinning out, doing so every day can get a bit old. Thankfully, we only have a few more days to go before we are in Krakow for the month of July.
A few things about food in Denmark. It is still as expensive as it was in Sweden and there are a few more Michelin starred restaurants in Copenhagen (14) then there are in Stockholm (12). Our first meal is one that we would rather forget for the most part. Lynn and I called while we were driving from Kalmar to Copenhagen and made reservations at Relae, a newly-starred Michelin restaurant. We had made reservations at Kong Hans Kalder for the next night, which also has its own Michelin star. So, tired and hungry, we made it to Relae. It is located in an up and coming area of Copenhagen, about a 10 minute drive from where we were staying. Just as a side note, I am glad that I didn't waste space on my memory card for pictures of their food.
We arrived and were seated at the bar, which was the only space they had for that night. The bar wasn't your traditional bar, but a window into the kitchen, which was all open. We were able to look in and see the students preparing. And no, I am not demeaning them. They were students who had gotten apprenticeships at the restaurant. It was nice to see that they were from all over the world (really). Anyway, we sat down and ordered some water, two glasses of champagne and their appetizer, which was a bundle of fresh herbs with pistachios. It was very good and, of course, fresh tasting. Now, I have to gripe about something. If I order sparkling water, I get that you are going to charge me. But, when I order tap water and you charge me $6 per bottle, then there is a problem. I know it was tap water, because I saw them pouring it from the tap into my bottle. Yeah, $6 per little trip to the tap for some water. We had two bottles that night.
There are only two choices for your meal at Relae- the standard menu with four courses and then the vegetable menu with four courses (two of which were the same). There was also the wine tasting menu that went along with it for an extra $75 a person. Each menu was also $75 a person. When we asked if they had a wine list that was separate, he went to great, overbearing lengths to point out that the wines on the wine tasting menu were perfectly paired for the meal, and that the wines on the wine list would be the same as on the menu and it would be cheaper if we each got the wine menu. We still asked for the list. And he was wrong. They had a much larger selection and better prices for some bottles then if we got ONE of the wine menus. We settled on a French white, which later turned out to be vin ordinaire (read: table wine in France). It was good though, much like some table wines in wine producing countries are. Our waiter comes back over with our bottle then decides he wants to tell us all about the vintner. Most times, I would be OK with that. Not when I am hungry and exhausted. I don't care that he used to be a photographer for Vogue. Maybe tomorrow I would, but not tonight. There was just a certain arrogance that prevailed there.
Have I mentioned that there were really only two waiters? No? Well, there were. The rest of the service was provided by the student-chefs in the kitchen.
We ordered the regular menu. Our first course can only be described as sushi, gone wrong, as envisioned by a Copenhagen chef. It was raw hake with old leeks, horseradish and bergamont. As I have stated before, I am not the biggest seafood fan. And now I am eating raw hake with old leeks, whatever those are. The only redeeming moment was when I got the one tiny bite with bergamont in it. That brought it all together and made it work. But it was only one tiny bite out of a dish with several bites that were disgusting.
Then came one of the two decent courses- asparagus with crispy buckwheat, pumpkin seeds and mint served with a lemon beure blanc. Lynn and I both agreed that it was a very good course.
So, we were hoping that the "main course" so to speak, would pick it up. Maybe the fish was just a fluke. Nope. Sous vide chicken wings with gizzards, liver and milk poached asparagus with a fish sauce. Yeah. I still don't get it either. First off, sous vide just pisses me off for the most part. Putting food into a bag, sucking out the air and then sticking it in an immersion circulator that keeps the water at a constant, low temperature in order to cook it is a waste of time for me. I haven't ever eaten anything that I liked that was cooked sous vide. Even in art culinare, when I was told that my beef was too tough after it had been cooked like that. Anyway, back to Relae. The gizzards and liver were not chopped evenly at all. I'm pretty sure that's the first thing they teach you in culinary school- how to chop things evenly. The chicken wings were cooked sous vide. They WERE cooked through, but tasted and looked raw. It doesn't take a lot to screw up a chicken wing, but somehow they managed. They didn't get some of the skin off of mine when they removed it from the bone, and that was not a texture I wanted to deal with. And the fish sauce? What the heck? I think that was the only good part of the dish, and even then, it just didn't work.
We finished off the meal with the only other dish from the menu that we liked, elder flower sorbet, rhubarb crumble and yogurt. That was very good. Just as a side note, elder flower is used a lot in making spirits. It has a nice floral flavor that works well with white chocolate (in my opinion, as seen by the gelato pairings that I have made here in Denmark).
Then it was time for the check. It took us several minutes (OK, 10 minutes) to get one of the two waiters' attention. The whole bill for the two of us came to $300. $300 for two menus, a bottle of French table wine, two bundles of herbs with nuts in them and two bottles of tap water. That also included the fact that our dishes were explained to us by the kitchen students who had to come out and explain what we were eating. No wonder the meal took 3 hours.
A few things about food in Denmark. It is still as expensive as it was in Sweden and there are a few more Michelin starred restaurants in Copenhagen (14) then there are in Stockholm (12). Our first meal is one that we would rather forget for the most part. Lynn and I called while we were driving from Kalmar to Copenhagen and made reservations at Relae, a newly-starred Michelin restaurant. We had made reservations at Kong Hans Kalder for the next night, which also has its own Michelin star. So, tired and hungry, we made it to Relae. It is located in an up and coming area of Copenhagen, about a 10 minute drive from where we were staying. Just as a side note, I am glad that I didn't waste space on my memory card for pictures of their food.
We arrived and were seated at the bar, which was the only space they had for that night. The bar wasn't your traditional bar, but a window into the kitchen, which was all open. We were able to look in and see the students preparing. And no, I am not demeaning them. They were students who had gotten apprenticeships at the restaurant. It was nice to see that they were from all over the world (really). Anyway, we sat down and ordered some water, two glasses of champagne and their appetizer, which was a bundle of fresh herbs with pistachios. It was very good and, of course, fresh tasting. Now, I have to gripe about something. If I order sparkling water, I get that you are going to charge me. But, when I order tap water and you charge me $6 per bottle, then there is a problem. I know it was tap water, because I saw them pouring it from the tap into my bottle. Yeah, $6 per little trip to the tap for some water. We had two bottles that night.
There are only two choices for your meal at Relae- the standard menu with four courses and then the vegetable menu with four courses (two of which were the same). There was also the wine tasting menu that went along with it for an extra $75 a person. Each menu was also $75 a person. When we asked if they had a wine list that was separate, he went to great, overbearing lengths to point out that the wines on the wine tasting menu were perfectly paired for the meal, and that the wines on the wine list would be the same as on the menu and it would be cheaper if we each got the wine menu. We still asked for the list. And he was wrong. They had a much larger selection and better prices for some bottles then if we got ONE of the wine menus. We settled on a French white, which later turned out to be vin ordinaire (read: table wine in France). It was good though, much like some table wines in wine producing countries are. Our waiter comes back over with our bottle then decides he wants to tell us all about the vintner. Most times, I would be OK with that. Not when I am hungry and exhausted. I don't care that he used to be a photographer for Vogue. Maybe tomorrow I would, but not tonight. There was just a certain arrogance that prevailed there.
Have I mentioned that there were really only two waiters? No? Well, there were. The rest of the service was provided by the student-chefs in the kitchen.
We ordered the regular menu. Our first course can only be described as sushi, gone wrong, as envisioned by a Copenhagen chef. It was raw hake with old leeks, horseradish and bergamont. As I have stated before, I am not the biggest seafood fan. And now I am eating raw hake with old leeks, whatever those are. The only redeeming moment was when I got the one tiny bite with bergamont in it. That brought it all together and made it work. But it was only one tiny bite out of a dish with several bites that were disgusting.
Then came one of the two decent courses- asparagus with crispy buckwheat, pumpkin seeds and mint served with a lemon beure blanc. Lynn and I both agreed that it was a very good course.
So, we were hoping that the "main course" so to speak, would pick it up. Maybe the fish was just a fluke. Nope. Sous vide chicken wings with gizzards, liver and milk poached asparagus with a fish sauce. Yeah. I still don't get it either. First off, sous vide just pisses me off for the most part. Putting food into a bag, sucking out the air and then sticking it in an immersion circulator that keeps the water at a constant, low temperature in order to cook it is a waste of time for me. I haven't ever eaten anything that I liked that was cooked sous vide. Even in art culinare, when I was told that my beef was too tough after it had been cooked like that. Anyway, back to Relae. The gizzards and liver were not chopped evenly at all. I'm pretty sure that's the first thing they teach you in culinary school- how to chop things evenly. The chicken wings were cooked sous vide. They WERE cooked through, but tasted and looked raw. It doesn't take a lot to screw up a chicken wing, but somehow they managed. They didn't get some of the skin off of mine when they removed it from the bone, and that was not a texture I wanted to deal with. And the fish sauce? What the heck? I think that was the only good part of the dish, and even then, it just didn't work.
We finished off the meal with the only other dish from the menu that we liked, elder flower sorbet, rhubarb crumble and yogurt. That was very good. Just as a side note, elder flower is used a lot in making spirits. It has a nice floral flavor that works well with white chocolate (in my opinion, as seen by the gelato pairings that I have made here in Denmark).
Then it was time for the check. It took us several minutes (OK, 10 minutes) to get one of the two waiters' attention. The whole bill for the two of us came to $300. $300 for two menus, a bottle of French table wine, two bundles of herbs with nuts in them and two bottles of tap water. That also included the fact that our dishes were explained to us by the kitchen students who had to come out and explain what we were eating. No wonder the meal took 3 hours.
No comments:
Post a Comment